(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-23 05:25 am (UTC)
Thanks for the ID. I'll bet it took you all of...one minute? Maybe less? I love how it looks like nobody else even took a few minutes to try to identify the thing before reporting it in the paper.

To be fair they don't actually call 20 cm "big" but their wording tries to suggest that it is...you know, until someone takes two seconds to think about how the creature is actually smaller than a school ruler. ONOEZ IT WILL EAT US ALL WITH ITS GARGOYLE FACE

The poor thing, being called "strange and ugly"! Mean people. :(
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

tripathy: (Default)
tripathy

December 2010

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314 15161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags